離婚贍養費 同居分手費 子女監護權
第一句:贍養費 alimony(75 字)
In family law scholarship on postdivorce finances, the alimony awards requiring higher-earning spouses to provide periodic payments and helping dependent partners rebuild careers after long marriages were financial remedies that were calibrated by cautious judges, which were either defended as compensation for sacrificed opportunities or criticized by commentators who were convinced that lifelong support discouraged self-reliance, thereby correcting economic imbalances by redistributing income and recognizing domestic labor across jurisdictions that had long undervalued unpaid caregiving.
1. 結構破解
In family law scholarship on postdivorce finances,
the alimony awards
requiring higher-earning spouses to provide periodic payments
and helping dependent partners rebuild careers after long marriages
were financial remedies
that were calibrated by cautious judges,
which were either defended as compensation for sacrificed opportunities
or criticized by commentators
who were convinced that lifelong support discouraged self-reliance,
thereby correcting economic imbalances
by redistributing income
and recognizing domestic labor
across jurisdictions
that had long undervalued unpaid caregiving.
2. 分解為短句
In family law scholarship on postdivorce finances, the alimony awards were financial remedies.(主句骨架)
The awards required higher-earning spouses to provide periodic payments and helped dependent partners rebuild careers after long marriages.
The remedies were calibrated by cautious judges.
The remedies were either defended as compensation for sacrificed opportunities or criticized by commentators.
The commentators were convinced that lifelong support discouraged self-reliance.
This corrected economic imbalances by redistributing income and recognizing domestic labor across jurisdictions.
The jurisdictions had long undervalued unpaid caregiving.
3. 參考譯文
在關於離婚後財務的家事法研究中,要求收入較高的配偶定期給付、並協助依賴型伴侶在長期婚姻後重建職涯的贍養費裁判,是由謹慎法官所斟酌調整的財務補救措施;這些措施若非被捍衛為對犧牲機會的補償,就是受到深信終身扶養會削弱自立的評論者所批評,從而藉由重新分配收入並承認家務勞動,在長期低估無償照護價值的法域中矯正了經濟失衡。
4. 組合寫作練習(請勿看例句,嘗試將短句組回原長句)
5. 補充說明
requiring / helping:現在分詞片語,取代 which required... and helped...
require A to + V:要求 A 做……;help A (to) + V:協助 A 做……
alimony:「贍養費」;patrimony 則是「祖傳財產、世襲遺產」,不可混用
calibrate:「斟酌調整」;remedy:「補救措施」
be convinced that + 子句:深信……
self-reliance:「自立」;imbalance:「失衡」
undervalue:「低估」;unpaid caregiving:「無償照護」
第二句:同居分手費 palimony(80 字)
In court decisions on unmarried partnerships, the palimony claims allowing long-term cohabitants to seek financial support after separation and asking judges to enforce spoken or implied promises were equitable remedies that were recognized by some progressive courts, which were either praised for protecting dependent partners or rejected by judges who were reluctant to treat informal relationships like legal marriages, thereby extending economic fairness by acknowledging shared households and exposing gaps that had long left cohabitants unprotected across many legal systems.
1. 結構破解
In court decisions on unmarried partnerships,
the palimony claims
allowing long-term cohabitants to seek financial support after separation
and asking judges to enforce spoken or implied promises
were equitable remedies
that were recognized by some progressive courts,
which were either praised for protecting dependent partners
or rejected by judges
who were reluctant to treat informal relationships like legal marriages,
thereby extending economic fairness
by acknowledging shared households
and exposing gaps
that had long left cohabitants unprotected
across many legal systems.
2. 分解為短句
In court decisions on unmarried partnerships, the palimony claims were equitable remedies.(主句骨架)
The claims allowed long-term cohabitants to seek financial support after separation and asked judges to enforce spoken or implied promises.
The remedies were recognized by some progressive courts.
The remedies were either praised for protecting dependent partners or rejected by judges.
The judges were reluctant to treat informal relationships like legal marriages.
This extended economic fairness by acknowledging shared households and exposing gaps across many legal systems.
The gaps had long left cohabitants unprotected.
3. 參考譯文
在關於未婚伴侶關係的法院判決中,允許長期同居者於分手後請求經濟扶助、並要求法官執行口頭或默示承諾的同居分手費請求,是由部分進步法院所承認的衡平法補救措施;這些措施若非因保護依賴型伴侶而受讚揚,就是被不願把非正式關係當作合法婚姻對待的法官所駁回,從而藉由承認共同家戶來擴展經濟公平,並在許多法律體系中揭露長期讓同居者缺乏保障的缺口。
4. 組合寫作練習(請勿看例句,嘗試將短句組回原長句)
5. 補充說明
allowing / asking:現在分詞片語,取代 which allowed... and asked...
allow A to + V:允許 A 做……;ask A to + V:要求 A 做……
palimony:「同居分手費」,由 pal(夥伴)+ alimony 混合而成的新造詞
cohabitant:「同居者」;equitable:「衡平法上的、公平的」
be reluctant to + V:不願意……(to 為不定詞)
implied promise:「默示承諾」;enforce:「執行」
leave A unprotected:使 A 缺乏保障
第三句:子女監護權 custody(76 字)
In developmental research on child welfare, the custody arrangements assigning parents legal authority over major decisions and scheduling regular time with each household were judicial orders that were shaped by evolving family courts, which were either endorsed as safeguards for children's stability or contested by parents who were anxious that rigid schedules ignored their circumstances, thereby prioritizing the child's best interests by limiting parental conflict and sustaining relationships that had long been disrupted across divorcing families.
1. 結構破解
In developmental research on child welfare,
the custody arrangements
assigning parents legal authority over major decisions
and scheduling regular time with each household
were judicial orders
that were shaped by evolving family courts,
which were either endorsed as safeguards for children's stability
or contested by parents
who were anxious that rigid schedules ignored their circumstances,
thereby prioritizing the child's best interests
by limiting parental conflict
and sustaining relationships
that had long been disrupted
across divorcing families.
2. 分解為短句
In developmental research on child welfare, the custody arrangements were judicial orders.(主句骨架)
The arrangements assigned parents legal authority over major decisions and scheduled regular time with each household.
The orders were shaped by evolving family courts.
The orders were either endorsed as safeguards for children's stability or contested by parents.
The parents were anxious that rigid schedules ignored their circumstances.
This prioritized the child's best interests by limiting parental conflict and sustaining relationships across divorcing families.
The relationships had long been disrupted.
3. 參考譯文
在兒童福利的發展研究中,賦予父母對重大決定的法律權限、並安排與各個家戶規律相處時間的監護安排,是由不斷演進的家事法院所形塑的司法命令;這些命令若非被認可為兒童穩定的保障,就是受到焦慮僵固時程忽視自身處境的父母所質疑,從而藉由限制父母衝突並維繫長期受擾的關係,在離婚家庭中優先考量子女最佳利益。
4. 組合寫作練習(請勿看例句,嘗試將短句組回原長句)
5. 補充說明
assigning / scheduling:現在分詞片語,取代 which assigned... and scheduled...
assign A B:賦予 A(人)B(權限);schedule:「安排時程」
custody:「監護權」;legal custody:法律監護(重大決定權);physical custody:實際照顧
be anxious that + 子句:擔憂……
best interests of the child:「子女最佳利益」
contest:「提出異議、質疑」;endorse:「認可、背書」
disrupt:「擾亂、破壞」;circumstances:「處境、情況」
三句皆沿用原骨架:主句為「名詞+現在分詞片語+were+名詞」,接 that 子句、which were either...or...,最後以 thereby+V-ing 收尾。
留言
張貼留言