語意學 Semantics

 語意學 Semantics

● 字源

semantics 來自古希臘文 σημαντικός (sēmantikós,有意義的、表示符號的),由 σῆμα (sêma,記號、符號) 與相關動詞 σημαίνειν (sēmaínein,以符號指示、意指) 衍生。經法語 sémantique(由 Michel Bréal 於 1883 年左右用於語言意義研究)進入英語(約 19 世紀末),取代較早的 semasiology。古典時期指「有意義的、給予記號的」,現代語言學則專指語言單位如何承載、組合與詮釋意義的規則與結構研究。中文「語意學」有時也寫作「語義學」,須依上下文判斷。

● 例句(約80字)

Although traditional lexicographers and classical philosophers, focusing mainly on dictionary definitions, lexical senses and the correspondence of words to external referents, often treated semantics as a static inventory of fixed meanings derived from authoritative usage or logical analysis, modern formal and cognitive linguists, who developed rigorous models of compositional meaning, truth-conditional interpretation and conceptual structures in the twentieth century while investigating cross-linguistic patterns of sense extension and underspecification, demonstrated that the interpretive principles governing reference, predication and discourse coherence constituted a dynamic, context-sensitive system of knowledge, a perspective that later scholars, valuing formal precision and empirical psychological evidence, regarded as central theoretical inquiry, not merely a catalogue of isolated word senses or arbitrary conventional associations bound to a single cultural tradition.

● 排列為比較容易閱讀的方式

Although traditional lexicographers and classical philosophers,

focusing mainly on dictionary definitions, lexical senses and the correspondence of words to external referents,

often treated semantics as a static inventory of fixed meanings derived from authoritative usage or logical analysis,

modern formal and cognitive linguists,

who developed rigorous models of compositional meaning, truth-conditional interpretation and conceptual structures in the twentieth century

while investigating cross-linguistic patterns of sense extension and underspecification,

demonstrated that the interpretive principles governing reference, predication and discourse coherence

constituted a dynamic, context-sensitive system of knowledge,

a perspective

that later scholars,

valuing formal precision and empirical psychological evidence,

regarded as central theoretical inquiry,

not merely a catalogue of isolated word senses or arbitrary conventional associations bound to a single cultural tradition.

● 分解為原初的短小句

Traditional lexicographers and classical philosophers focused mainly on dictionary definitions, lexical senses and the correspondence of words to external referents.

(focusing 是分詞構句,表示主要關注點。)

They often treated semantics as a static inventory of fixed meanings.

(treat A as B:把 A 視為 B。)

These meanings were derived from authoritative usage or logical analysis.

(derived from 是過去分詞片語,修飾 meanings。)

Modern formal and cognitive linguists developed rigorous models of compositional meaning, truth-conditional interpretation and conceptual structures.

(who 子句;models 指嚴謹模型。)

They did this in the twentieth century.

They investigated cross-linguistic patterns of sense extension and underspecification.

(while investigating 表示同時進行。)

They demonstrated something.

(主句骨架;demonstrated 後接 that 子句。)

The interpretive principles governing reference, predication and discourse coherence constituted a dynamic, context-sensitive system of knowledge.

(governing 分詞片語補充說明 principles。)

This was a perspective.

(a perspective 是同位語,回指前面「把詮釋原則視為動態、情境敏感知識系統」的觀點。)

Later scholars valued formal precision and empirical psychological evidence.

(valuing 分詞構句,表示原因或伴隨狀態。)

They regarded the perspective as central theoretical inquiry.

(regard A as B。)

They did not regard it as merely a catalogue of isolated word senses or arbitrary conventional associations bound to a single cultural tradition.

(not 前省略 as;bound to 是過去分詞片語,修飾 associations。)

● 文法解析

Although 讓步子句 + 主句對比:

Although 子句到 analysis 結束,骨架是 lexicographers and philosophers treated semantics。逗號後的 modern formal and cognitive linguists 才是主句主詞,要讀到 demonstrated 才找到謂語。

focusing 分詞構句插入:

focusing mainly on ... 夾在主詞 lexicographers and philosophers 與謂語 treated 之間,說明關注焦點。跳過它,骨架就是 lexicographers and philosophers treated semantics。

as a static inventory 結構:

treated ... as a static inventory of ... 中,as 接名詞片語。

who 關係子句插入:

who developed ... and underspecification 夾在 linguists 與 demonstrated 之間,是整句最長的干擾段。while investigating 標示時間與伴隨動作。

demonstrated that 子句:

that 子句的骨架是 the interpretive principles ... constituted a dynamic, context-sensitive system of knowledge。

governing 分詞片語:

補充說明 interpretive principles 的具體內容。

a perspective 同位語:

回指整個 that 子句所表達的觀點。

valuing 分詞構句:

夾在 scholars 與 regarded 之間,說明後期學者的價值取向。

not merely ... 對比結構:

與 as central theoretical inquiry 形成對比,否定「僅僅是孤立詞義目錄或任意約定」的舊看法。

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

古代三大陸 58個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句 說明古代三大陸由來

緬甸古都曼德勒故宮 63個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句

英格蘭大憲章 54個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句 說明美國要有成文憲法的原因