追訴時效 statute of limitations

追訴時效  statute of limitations

●字源

「追訴時效」對應英文 statute of limitations(或 limitation period、prescription)。statute 來自拉丁文 statutum「已制定的法令」,動詞 statuere「設立、規定」;limitation 來自拉丁文 limitatio「劃定界限」,動詞 limitare「限制」。合起來字面意思是「由法令劃定的追訴期限」。中文「追訴時效」的「時效」原指時間效力,近代法律翻譯時用來對應拉丁法系統的 praescriptio 與英美法的 statute of limitations,強調「逾一定期間即不得再追訴」的制度。

●例句(約108 words)

A statute of limitations, the body of temporal rules that extinguishes the state’s power to prosecute once a fixed period has elapsed from the commission of an offense, has seldom been easy to justify, for such constraints differ as widely as the brief windows that many systems impose on minor misdemeanors, the decades-long periods retained for serious felonies in some codes, and the absolute bars that certain jurisdictions still refuse to place upon the gravest crimes against humanity, so that it is chiefly by asking who may toll or extend these periods and under what extraordinary circumstances that scholars have judged whether a legal order truly balances the demands of finality against the claims of justice, a test whose strictest version, requiring that no exception stand above the written limit, is among the most contested.

●排列為比較容易閱讀的方式

A statute of limitations,

the body of temporal rules

that extinguishes the state’s power to prosecute

once a fixed period has elapsed from the commission of an offense,

has seldom been easy to justify,

for such constraints differ

as widely as

the brief windows that many systems impose on minor misdemeanors,

the decades-long periods retained for serious felonies in some codes,

and the absolute bars that certain jurisdictions still refuse to place upon the gravest crimes against humanity,

so that it is chiefly by asking who may toll or extend these periods and under what extraordinary circumstances

that scholars have judged whether a legal order truly balances the demands of finality against the claims of justice,

a test whose strictest version,

requiring that no exception stand above the written limit,

is among the most contested.

●分解為原初的短小句

A statute of limitations has seldom been easy to justify.(主結構。主詞與動詞之間隔著長同位語。)

A statute of limitations is a body of temporal rules.

The rules extinguish the state’s power to prosecute.

This happens once a fixed period has elapsed from the commission of an offense.

Such constraints differ widely.

One is the brief windows that many systems impose on minor misdemeanors.

Another is the decades-long periods retained for serious felonies in some codes.

Another is the absolute bars that certain jurisdictions still refuse to place upon the gravest crimes against humanity.

Scholars have chiefly asked who may toll or extend these periods and under what extraordinary circumstances.

By doing so they have judged whether a legal order truly balances the demands of finality against the claims of justice.

This is a test.

Its strictest version requires that no exception stand above the written limit.

That version is among the most contested.

●文法解析

主句:A statute of limitations…has seldom been easy to justify。同位語 the body of temporal rules…夾在主詞與 has 之間,內含 that 關係子句,以 once 引導時間狀語子句修飾 extinguishes。easy to justify 的 justify 受詞就是主詞 statute of limitations。

for such constraints differ…:for 是對等連接詞,意為「因為」。as widely as 後列舉三個名詞片語:the brief windows(後接 that 關係子句)、the decades-long periods(後接過去分詞 retained)、the absolute bars(後接 that 關係子句)。retained 是後置修飾,不是動詞。

so that it is…that…:so that 引導結果子句,內為強調句型 it is…that…,被強調的是 chiefly by asking…。還原為 scholars have chiefly judged…by asking…。asking 後接兩個並列的疑問詞片語 who may toll or extend these periods 與 under what extraordinary circumstances。whether a legal order truly balances…是名詞子句,當 judged 的受詞。

a test whose strictest version…is among the most contested:a test 是同位語,指前面「判斷法律秩序是否真正平衡終局性與正義」這件事。whose 引導關係子句,主詞是 version,動詞是最後的 is。中間 requiring that no exception stand above the written limit 是現在分詞片語,修飾 version;that 子句用假設語氣動詞原形 stand。among the most contested 後面省略名詞,等於 among the most contested tests。

●參考譯文

追訴時效是規定犯罪行為發生後經過一定期間即消滅國家追訴權的一套時間規則。它向來不易正當化,因為各國的限制差異極大:有許多制度對輕微犯罪設下的短暫窗口,有部分法典對重大重罪保留的數十年期間,也有某些法域至今仍拒絕對最嚴重的危害人類罪設置絕對禁止。學者大體是藉著追問「誰能在什麼特殊情況下中止或延長這些期間」,才判斷一個法律秩序是否真正平衡了終局性的要求與正義的主張。這項檢驗的最嚴格版本,要求沒有任何例外凌駕於成文期限之上,是其中爭議最大的之一。

●補充說明

句中用 seldom,不說 never,因為並非所有人都認為追訴時效難以正當化。用 chiefly 是因為學者判斷的方式不只一種。三個例子分別代表短期、長期、絕對禁止(或拒絕設置)三類,是舉例而非窮盡。英美法常用 statute of limitations,大陸法系則多用 prescription 或「時效」概念,但核心功能相近。

文法重點:長同位語夾在主詞與動詞之間、once 時間狀語子句、for 對等連接詞、as…as 帶三個名詞與後置過去分詞/關係子句、so that 帶強調句型、名詞子句 whether、同位語 a test whose…、現在分詞片語與假設語氣。

●長難句組合寫作練習

不看例句,用譯文與上列13個短句組合回原來的長句:

需要的話,我可以把這篇做成 Word 檔,或再依主題(如中止時效、告訴乃論)另寫一句。

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

古代三大陸 58個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句 說明古代三大陸由來

英格蘭大憲章 54個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句 說明美國要有成文憲法的原因

緬甸古都曼德勒故宮 63個英文字一句話 學術型超複雜文法結構長難句